Darryl Strucko

Security Platform Product Prototypes

Designing and validating product concepts across threat intelligence, SOC workflows, and security data pipelines.

Built as working prototypes to explore product direction, integration patterns, and user experience — not just UI.

3 projectsNext.js · Supabase · Real-time integrations

These prototypes explore how security platforms evolve from data ingestion to analyst decision-making and response.

01

Intelligence API + SecOps Platform Integration

Next.jsSupabaseRealtimeRBAC-simulated

Problem

Security teams struggle to prioritize and operationalize threat intelligence across multiple sources with inconsistent signal quality.

Approach

Partner portal to configure and tune intelligence inputs

SecOps portal to consume, prioritize, and act on that data

Real-time synchronization via a shared data layer

Platform Architecture (simplified)

Risk Scoring API

GET / PUT /api/weights

Supabase

weights · history · iocs

Configuration → Data Layer → Analyst Experience

What this demonstrates

Platform thinking across producers and consumers of data

API-driven integration between systems

Real-time feedback loop between configuration and analyst outcomes

Key capabilities

Tune and weight threat intelligence sources

Surface prioritized signals in analyst workflows

Push updates in real time across systems

Next steps

Introduce automated response actions

Expand correlation across multiple intelligence sources

Add adaptive scoring based on analyst behavior

02

Security Operations Intelligence Platform

Multi-persona design: T1 analyst → CISO
Next.jsSupabaseRealtimeRBAC-simulated

Problem

SOC teams operate across fragmented tools with limited visibility into coverage, prioritization, and analyst performance.

Approach

Multi-persona platform spanning T1 analyst through CISO views

Shared data with differentiated access across roles

What this demonstrates

Multi-role product design across operational and executive users

Alignment of tactical workflows with strategic visibility

Structured access and data segmentation through an RBAC model

Key capabilities

Triage, investigation, and proactive threat hunting workflows

MITRE ATT&CK coverage tracking and SLA monitoring

Guided demo and feedback capture for workflow validation

Next steps

Deeper correlation across alerts and intelligence sources

Executive-level risk summarization

Integration with enforcement and response systems

03

Audit Logging for Incident Response

Next.jsSupabaseMulti-format Export

Problem

Capturing and reconstructing analyst actions during incidents is often inconsistent, making compliance and post-incident review difficult.

Approach

DFIR-focused logging and export system

Captures analyst actions in real time and generates structured outputs for compliance and review

What this demonstrates

Alignment between product design and compliance requirements

Data modeling for auditability and traceability

Output design for compliance, reporting, and incident response teams

Key capabilities

Capture analyst actions during investigation workflows

Generate structured reports in multiple formats

Export for compliance and post-incident analysis

Next steps

Timeline reconstruction and visualization

Integration with case management systems

Automated compliance report generation

These are demonstration environments intended to showcase product direction and workflow design. No real customer or production data is used.

Built with Claude · Hosted on darrylstrucko.com